Nov 12, 2009

Sad that it has to be said 

The upsetting part here is that some Army jackoff wearing stars on their shoulders will probably go after THIS Major for stating the facts. And why not? No less than the Army Chief of Staff said that the worst thing about the Fort Hood attack wasn't the death of US soldiers. No, no... it was the threat posed to "diversity." Not to knock the Army (even though under normal circumstances I take every opportunity), but I gotta believe that any Marine that was saying the kinds of things Hasan was saying would have been looking at a discharge or a General Court quick fast and in a hurry. I have said it for years: political correctness will kill us all. Consider Fort Hood only the most recent example.
|

Nov 10, 2009

Until the day we die 

Happy Birthday, Marines!



Watch this video at YouTube (in HQ) or LiveLeak

Last year's video and all my creations can be found by clicking the YouTube and LiveLeak channels on the sidebar.
|

Nov 6, 2009

Valour-IT 

Been really busy and almost forgot to put up the link this year. I'll go haze myself now...

And I'm back.

Go give and help the Marine Team smoke the competition this year. Sure the money all goes to the same place, but to quote Big Worm, "there's principalities in this".
-----------------
About Project Valour-IT
|

Nov 1, 2009

A case study... 

... in everything that Dubya wasn't. I leave it to you on how to interpret this photo op solemn moment.

More.
|

Oct 23, 2009

Because I think it's cool 

I'm a video game junkee, much to the beloved Wif's chagrin. Oh yes, it's true. I can hit line drives and snipe bad guys with the best of 'em, from right here behind this keyboard. I don't have an XBOX 360... and given my current status as husband and daddy, I may - nay, probably WILL - never have one. But I sure as hell wish I did, if for no other reason than to play THIS. As proven by a bevy of films and video games, in the future, ALL military worth mention are MARINES... well, SPACE Marines, but Marines nonetheless...



This is everything that the Starship Troopers movie should have been, condensed to 150 seconds. Double-click it to watch in super-big HD. Trust me. It's worth it.
|

The Cheney Plan for Afghanistan 

Awesome.
|

Oct 22, 2009

Mo' money, mo' problems 

I get a pay raise. Yay! Most everything else is screwed up, though...

Allow me to deconstruct:

Military personnel will get an above-inflation pay raise of 3.4 percent (sweet) under a Pentagon policy bill the Senate passed Thursday and sent to President Obama for his signature.

The pay increase was a half-percentage point more than Obama sought earlier this year and beats the average pay boost in the private sector. (Dirty little secret: this is the last time this is gonna happen for a LOOONNG time. Every budget that touches DoD is about to dry up faster than your tongue after an all-nighter.)

The popular legislation also gives Obama a few victories in his bid to kill some especially costly weapons systems, though it contains an effort by lawmakers to continue development -- over the president's strong objections -- of a costly alternative engine for the Pentagon's next-generation fighter jet. (More on that in a moment...)

The Senate cleared the House-Senate compromise measure by a 68-29 vote.

The far-reaching legislation also prohibits the Obama administration from transferring any detainee being held at the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba to the U.S. for trial (wait for it...) until 45 days after it has given notice to Congress (and there it is. I waited longer for GI Joes that I ordered with UPC symbols through the mail when I was a kid. The fact that Gitmo club members can come here at all is ludicrous). Guantanamo prisoners could not be released into the U.S. (Yeah, just tried here and then sent... where?)

The bill also contains unrelated legislation strengthening federal hate crimes laws to include violence against homosexuals, angering Republicans who objected to the military measure carrying social legislation. (This is offensive for the same reason that ALL hate crime legislation is offensive. Why are there two sets of rules? Either a crime was committed or it wasn't - the WHY doesn't matter. How can you justify that I - as a white male - could face a whole different set of laws if I were to punch a black guy than if I were to punch a white guy? And somebody tell me the last time that a GAY dude was charged with a hate crime against a straight dude. Stupid.)

The bill also contains significant changes to voting procedures for U.S. troops and other American voters overseas. (Such as? Will have to look this up later, as they totally dropped the topic right there.)

Some Pentagon reform advocates had hoped Obama would take a more aggressive stance against costly and poorly performing weapons systems. But Obama and Defense Secretary Robert Gates focused most of their attention on a handful of items, especially trying to kill the jobs-rich but well-over-budget F-22 fighter program, which has its origins in the Cold War era and, its critics maintain, is poorly suited for anti-insurgent battles in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The measure would terminate production of the F-22.

And there is perhaps the WORST part of this bill. There's an old saying: you always end up fighting the last war. In other words, tactics don't keep up with technology or, more importantly, a different and forward thinking enemy. The Civil War was fought with rifles, but troops formed in lines of battle that George Washington would have been comfortable with to mass the fires from his men's muskets. The French set up for a repeat of the trench warfare of WWI and were greeted by the Blitzkrieg. In this case, we're so focused on THIS war that we're about to kill a weapon system that has "next war" written all over it, under the delusion that it's a complete waste of time because it was designed during the last war. When the feces impacts the rotary impeller and there are MiGs on the horizon (and make no mistake - even if we're not shooting Russians, we will be shooting MiGs... and some bad ass star-fighters they will be, at that) you're gonna want that cowbell boys. I promise ya.

No, no... instead, we're gonna spend more money on an engine for the F-35 that nobody asked for, nobody needs, and - more than likely - nobody will use. Don't get me wrong. The F-35 is a great bird and will do wonders, but it can't do what the F-22 will. We've closed bases and shut off systems in the name of redundancy, but now we've gotta keep that widget factory open to make a totally redundant and useless piece of gear save jobs. Nice politickin' there, boys.

Oh, and this is also is the official legislation ceding Poland and eastern Europe back to the Russians, making final the death of the missile defense system that POTUS crushed with his open hand/unclenched fist back in September... on the anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland.

So, to sum up: I'll enjoy the pay bump because I won't be seeing another one for awhile, hardened terrorists may be able to take advantage of new hate-crime legislation in US courts, we will squelch a great aircraft to make worthless crap for another aircraft, and the Cold War v2.0 loading bar is reading somewhere around 50%. I think that covers it. Oh, and I'm supposedly about to get 55,000 new friends in camouflage... but considering the state of DoD funding - like I said before - I think that's a recruiting goal that will be downsized. Maybe we can get some of them jobs building that useless F-35 engine instead.
|

Oct 13, 2009

History geek 

I am one.

And now, for your viewing pleasure, the Civil War. In four minutes.

|

Oct 9, 2009

There he is. Miss America?‏ 

My head exploded.

Blew right the f@ck up.

I got in my car this morning, turned on the radio, and then – like a mafia hit – brains splattered all over the inside of the vehicle. It looked like that scene at the end of “Pulp Fiction” where Travolta shoots the guy in the face. Grey matter on the windows. Blood and bits of scorched skull gathering in the folds of the seat cusions.

They gave him what?

They gave Obama… WHAT!?

Barack H. Obama? Jesus H. Christ…

If this doesn’t lock down for everyone that the Nobel Peace Prize is now the biggest f@cking farce in the world, I don’t know what will. Once upon a time, the Prize held some kind of meaning. Look at the list. Mother Teresa. MLK. Albert Schweitzer. Lech Walesa. Even Teddy Roosevelt got in on the act with the peace treaty he honchoed between the Ruskies and the Japanese. And then things go slightly awry.

Yasser Arafat? Check. Jimmy Carter? Check. Kofi freaking Annan in 2001, while “Oil for Food” was scandalizing it’s merry away through Iraq and around the world? Check. Let’s take a trip to the wayback machine: Woodrow Wilson… for his creation of the League of Nations. Yeah, that worked out great. And apparently Gorbachev ended the Cold War all on his lonesome. Thatcher? Reagan? John Paul II? Who? All of which brings us to the Goracle himself, with his big grab bag full of overheated lies, “An Inconvenient Truth… because it isn’t.”

But I will give Algore this: at least he did SOMETHING. He made a movie full of half-truths and outright falsehoods, followed it with multiple fossil fueled trips jetting around the world to sell said movie, and made sure he left the lights, a/c, and a small thermonuclear reactor running in his home 24/7 - racking up an electric bill to the tune of 24 times larger than the average American’s – while he was out telling us all about how evil we were for driving our SUVs. But what – and I’m serious here – did Obama do to “deserve” the Nobel? And given the timing, on what basis was he even nominated?

The nomination process closed February 1st. That means the man was nominated less than 12 days into his Presidency - or, mind numbingly, before he had even taken office. At that point he had signed the order to close Gitmo… which has since been basically rescinded. And… wait… gimme a second…

In the middle of February, he ordered a troop INCREASE for Afghanistan – not exactly the most “peaceful” of decisions. Yes, the Taliban and I somehow agree on this... which makes me a terrorist by the way, or something. And since then… what? You don’t suppose they’ve been sitting on announcing the next decision on Afghanistan because they thought another troop increase might spoil the Nobel, do you? Nooooo. They wouldn’t do that. At least I don’t think so. I mean, that would imply that somebody in the White House knew what the plan was and then waited for the Nobel announcement. I say that’s impossible because it doesn’t meet the first criteria: knowing the plan.

So why, then? Well, you want the official explanation? “He makes us feel funny in the pants.” Okay, maybe that’s not a direct quote. But this is:
"The Norwegian Nobel Committee has decided that the Nobel Peace Prize for 2009 is to be awarded to President Barack Obama for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples. The Committee has attached special importance to Obama's vision of and work for a world without nuclear weapons.”
That’s right… he won the Nobel Peace Prize by – like every other beauty queen in the history of ever – wishing for world peace. Every Miss America, Miss Universe, and Miss Strawberry Festival around the planet has been shorted since 1901, and they should be calling the switchboard in Norway asking to be put through to the Nobel Committee immediately. And since they're giving the things away based on good intentions and expressed interests, I say give him the Heisman too. I'm sure he likes college football as much as the next guy... why not? No, really. Give it to him.

So, congrats to POTUS/Miss Illinois. “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world's attention and given its people hope for a better future.” Between his Jesus-like ability to “capture attention” and “give hope,” and his forthcoming reenactment of the scene in Superman IV where he’ll be putting all our nukes in a giant net and throwing them into the sun, I am truly inspired. So much so, obviously, that my head exploded.
-------------------------
UPDATE: Great minds think alike.
|

Oct 2, 2009

Congrats to Rio 

I mean, they were able to concentrate on the Olympics. They didn't have to avoid other things in order to go to Copenhagen, so they kinda had an unfair advantage...
|

Sep 28, 2009

Priorities, Part 2 

"I've talked to the president, since I've been here, once on a VTC [video teleconferece]," Gen. Stanley McChrystal told CBS reporter David Martin in a television interview that aired Sunday.

"You've talked to him once in 70 days?" Mr. Martin followed up.

"That is correct," the general replied.

---------------------------------------------------
Today, the White House announced that President Barack Obama will travel to Copenhagen, Denmark to support Chicago's bid for the 2016 Summer Olympic and Paralympic Games at the 121st International Olympic Committee (IOC) Session.

Thank God... at least ONE community will be organized...
|

Sep 27, 2009

Priorities 

Why help the people who are dying when "there are people dying"?

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Click the image for story.
|

Sep 11, 2009

We are letting them down 

When the mastermind of 9/11 goes from looking like a caricature of Super Mario come to life to being almost the spitting image of a squeaky-cleaned-up Osama bin Laden - after more than six years in US custody - we have done something horribly wrong. Apparently, the waterboarding doesn't have any side effects other than make you cleaner, make you look healthier, and give your spectacular new beard a bright shiny coat.

We are letting the victims of 9/11 down when we treat their killers like they are at a goddam spa that we just happen to never let them leave. The fact that that man thing still draws breath offends me.

Every word I said on the 5 year anniversary still holds. We are engaged in Afghanistan now with a re-found vigor. That's a good start. But until we get over this self-serving need to feel good about how we treat an enemy who would happily saw off every one of our heads with a rusty kitchen knife, we are letting down the victims of 11 September 2001... and we are setting the stage for the same thing to happen again to the rest of us.
---------------------
UPDATE: "We've dishonored our dead and whitewashed our enemies."
|

Sep 9, 2009

Nazialized healthcare 

Seriously? You people out there who want the government involved in your health? Really?

Well then I guess you'll be okay with this:

Doctors left a premature baby to die because he was born two days too early, his devastated mother claimed yesterday.
Sarah Capewell begged them to save her tiny son, who was born just 21 weeks and five days into her pregnancy - almost four months early.
They ignored her pleas and allegedly told her they were following national guidelines that babies born before 22 weeks should not be given medical treatment.
Miss Capewell, 23, said doctors refused to even see her son Jayden, who lived for almost two hours without any medical support.
She said he was breathing unaided, had a strong heartbeat and was even moving his arms and legs, but medics refused to admit him to a special care baby unit.
...
James Paget Hospital in Norfolk refused to comment on the case but said it was not responsible for setting the guidelines relating to premature births.
A trust spokesman said: 'Like other acute hospitals, we follow national guidance from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine regarding premature births.'

You want the real kicker?

The guidelines were drawn up by the Nuffield Council on Bioethics after a two-year inquiry which took evidence from doctors, nurses and religious leaders.
But weeks before they were published in 2006, a child was born in the U.S. which proved a baby could survive at earlier than 22 weeks if it was given medical treatment.
Amillia Taylor was born in Florida on October 24, 2006, after just 21 weeks and six days in the womb. She celebrated her second birthday last year.
Doctors believed she was a week older and so gave her intensive care, but later admitted she would not have received treatment if they had known her true age.

So a "mistake" by American doctors that proved everyone wrong was completely ignored by the Brits... and now we want to ignore it ourselves and become more like them. You people have lost your f'n minds.
|

Sep 5, 2009

Pictures 

The milblogs are buzzing over the last day regarding the decision by the AP to release a photograph of a mortally wounded Marine in Afghanistan over the objections of both the DoD and, more importantly, his family. Some have taken the tack that not only should the picture never have been released, it should never have been taken. While I thoroughly agree that it was wrong to disrespect the wishes of the family, you may be surprised to know that I am somewhat more forgiving when it comes to the capturing of that moment for the historical record.

You see, I am a bit of an amateur historian. Maybe it was because my family took me on too many trips to Civil War and Revolutionary War battlefields when I was a kid. These trips often included us walking through row upon row of headstones looking for the family name carved on one of them at an age where it was one of the few things I knew how to spell and could call out “I found it.” I found military history interesting then and find it fascinating now.

To my mind, one of the most powerful aspects of military history is the photograph. The single most famous photo ever taken is arguably the flag raising on Mt. Suribachi. But to convey the other side of warfare is no less important. Men died on Iwo Jima. To read the history and study the numbers conveys that point, but it is the photo that gives one pause.

Since the invention of the camera, it has been used to capture the aftermath of battle, and in some instances the shutter snaps at the most terrifying second. “Loyalist Militiaman at the Moment of Death” is considered one of Robert Capa’s most famous photos, and has itself been argued as “perhaps the greatest war photograph ever made,” while Capa has been recognized as one of combat’s most skilled photojournalists.

No one questioned Capa’s abilities or humanity when he took that photo during the Spanish Civil war, or others he took on D-Day. But AP photographer Julie Jacobson is being torn to shreds by many right now for taking a picture of a Marine in his last moments. Maybe it’s rightfully so. Maybe she’s a glory hound looking to make a name for herself as big a Capa, or a Rosenthal, or a Galloway or any of the great combat photojournalists throughout history. To rip her (and the AP) over the photo because it was released against the family’s wishes is one thing. But because she took it at all is something else entirely.

What I find most interesting is that it seems to me that many of the people who are so upset by this photo are the same ones who insisted that everyone see the images of Neda after she was shot protesting the Iranian election results – images that are arguably far more disturbing because they are NOT split-second stills, but video in full color with the accompanying sounds of her gasping for breath and the people standing there crying helplessly as she dies. These are both images of patriots who stood up for things they believed were worth defending. Yet one is being viewed as a rallying cry, and the other as something to be hidden away, never to be seen again. When Cpl. Joel A. Chaverri took the below series of photos in Fallujah in 2004 he was not vilified.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Combination handout pictures released on December 17, 2004, (Upper L frame) showing U.S. Marine Platoon Gunnery Sergeant, Ryan P. Shane, from the 1st. Battalion of the 8th. Marine Regiment as he pulls a fatally wounded comrade to safety while under fire during a military operation in the Iraqi western city of Falluja. (Upper R frame) Shane and another member of the 1/8 pulled their fatally wounded comrade under fire. (Lower L frame) Shane (extreme, L) is hit by insurgent fire and (Lower R frame) lies wounded (L).

Of course, political spin was applied by various people as they viewed these images, but no one attacked the messenger. Was that because the fatally wounded Marine was never named? And does that pay him respect? Or does it make him a nameless, faceless cog in the military-industrial machine? And who decides that? I don’t know… does anyone?

In the end, with all the spin and outrage and argument, what will probably be lost is what’s most important: that LCpl. Joshua M. Bernard gave his life for his buddies and his country and that he was one of America’s finest. Do not think me cavalier if I throw out a quote from Full Metal Jacket, but I believe Gunnery Sergeant Hartman put it best.

Blank
Godspeed, Marine.


Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Aug. 14, 2009: U.S. Marine Lance Cpl. Joshua Bernard patrols in the Helmand Province of Afghanistan. Less than an hour later Bernard's squad was ambushed by Taliban fighters waiting in a pomegranate grove. Bernard was hit with a rocket propelled grenade and later died of his wounds. (AP)
----------------------
The photo in question is here. The family wished it wasn't out, but it is. Decide for yourself whether to click that link.
|

Aug 31, 2009

Games like Milton-Bradley 

Why post this? Like I need a reason...



For my money, the best line comes right at the 4 minute mark. I did a mini review of the D.I. here.
|

State Dept. reaches into hat, pulls out rabbit 

With the 70th Anniversary of the opening of WWII looming, as of one week ago the best America could produce to send to Poland for the memorial service was William Perry, the Clinton-era SecDef (one of 3, and not even the longest serving one, at that) . Seriously, fellas? An event featuring no less than 14 heads of state, to include Germany and Russia, and the best you pull out was William Perry? Somebody - taking a short pause from their rectal-cranial inversion syndrome - appointed retired Marine Commandant and current National Security Adviser James Jones to head up the American delegation.

This is a smart choice for a whole host of reasons, not the least of which being yet ANOTHER of Jones' prior jobs as the head of US European Command and the relationships he obviously would have developed in that capacity. In fact, if you aren't going to send POTUS hisself, Jones is
practically the obvious choice. Yet he was not named until less than three days out from the ceremony, after a hopelessly useless figure was initially announced, thereby making sure the Poles were good and agitated. Smooooooth...
|

Aug 26, 2009

'The Lion of the Senate' 

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Yeah, right...

You never want to speak ill of the dead, but in some cases... well... it's almost obligated. That being the case: so long Teddy. Mary Jo Kopechne* could not be reached for comment, but as far as I'm concerned, you were a Grade-A douche. (The counter-punch to that particular episode of douchiness is here. Check out the headline on that paper, by the way... that's right Teddy K was a douche on an international scale since before we put men on the moon.)

PS - I totally disagree with Michelle. If "not now," when? If you want to call me a monster for getting my shots in before he goes under the dirt, go ahead. But I intend to never speak the man's name again after this (if at all possible) and the history of damage that Teddy K has inflicted upon the country as he tried to implement an ever increasing amount of government control over everything is too great to go completely unspoken. "Not now"? What sense is there in talking about him later? As of right this second, I'm done with him.

*Fun fact: Mary Jo Kopechne was the #1 search on Google by 1PM EST today. Teddy's legacy is secure.
|

Aug 17, 2009

"Come on, you sons-o'-bitches! Do you want to live forever?" 

This extraordinary feature of combat is depicted in movies in bold, heroic colors, without depth or explanation. Most leaders in the military, however, spend a lifetime trying to understand its complexity. Our pursuit usually starts at Thermopylae, a mountain pass in northern Greece where, in 480 B.C., 300 Spartans faced the entire Persian army. Leonidas, the Spartan king, had a choice: retreat, and live to fight another day, or stand. When the Persian king offered, "We do not want your lives, only your arms," Leonidas answered, "Molon labe" -- come and get them. They held out for seven days, fighting until their weapons broke and then, Herodotus says, "with bare hands and teeth." Their spirit lives whenever wounded soldiers ask to return to their units rather than rotate home or sentries rest their chins on the point of a bayonet to stay awake so others sleep safely.

Before going into harm's way, we reflect on this remarkable aspect of combat. Using its history as a source of pride and inspiration, we make this bond part of our ethos. We are humbled to follow, yet hopeful to live up to, those who have gone before -- as at Belleau Wood in 1918. When his men were being cut to pieces by German machine guns, Marine 1st Sgt. Dan Daly, already the recipient of two Medals of Honor, charged the guns shouting, "Come on, you sons-o'-bitches! Do you want to live forever?" More than just history, this retelling to each new generation becomes a pledge: Although some will die, those who follow will keep the faith by keeping our memory -- a promise of immortality that asks, instead, "Don't you want to live forever?"
...
Once you've experienced it, the memory never leaves -- even after those fair winds and following seas have taken you as far as they did Sen. Mike Mansfield. After serving two years in the Marines as a teenager, he spent 34 years in Congress (the longest-serving majority leader ever) and 11 years as ambassador to Japan. He died in 2001 at age 98. His tombstone in Arlington National Cemetery bears seven words: "Michael Joseph Mansfield, PVT, US Marine Corps."
|

Aug 6, 2009

Well, thank God THAT'S over with 

I wonder if this will get me a different ribbon next time I deploy?
It's official. The U.S. is no longer engaged in a "war on terrorism." Neither is it fighting "jihadists" or in a "global war."

President Obama's top homeland security and counterterrorism official took all three terms off the table of acceptable words inside the White House during a speech Thursday at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank.

"The President does not describe this as a 'war on terrorism,'" said John Brennan, head of the White House homeland security office, who outlined a "new way of seeing" the fight against terrorism.

The only terminology that Mr. Brennan said the administration is using is that the U.S. is "at war with al Qaeda."
Fortunately for us, al Qaeda is the ONLY terrorist organization in the world now, apparently. So if that's truly the case, then I guess we must've been doing something right all this time then... Yeaaa, us!...
|

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com