Jul 11, 2009

"Lucky Strike means fine tobacco" 

Or at least it used to. Nowadays it would mean "tobacco fines."
Pentagon health experts are pressing Defense Secretary Robert Gates to ban the use of tobacco by troops and ends its sale on military property, according to USA Today.
I enjoy the occasional cigar (on far fewer occasions now that there's a kid in the house), but I don't smoke cigarettes and I've never been a dipper... I can't even stand the smell of it. In fact, I find chewing to be a nasty, repugnant habit. However, there is no more sure fire way to ensure open revolt than to take away a fightin' man's tabaccy. Well maybe if you cut off his coffee...

The most laughable part of this whole thing however, is the reasoning behind it.
Tobacco use costs the Pentagon $846 million a year in medical care and lost productivity, according to the study, which was released last month and used older data. The Department of Veterans Affairs spends up to $6 billion in treatments for tobacco-related illnesses, the study found.
So, here we are in the middle of giving away TRILLIONS to looting free-loaders and the Pentagon is sweating $846 million!? You could find that in spare change recovered annually from between the couch cushions in the offices of the E-Ring. And besides, if we're all going to have government health care anyway, since when was money an object?

Look, we're the military. We follow lawful orders as passed down from our civilian leadership. And I suppose that if the civilians think that a smoke-free, all vegetarian, tofu snacking military is what they want protecting them, then that's what the US military will eventually become... for as long as it holds out before fainting while climbing a flight of stairs. But more typically what you get are type-A carnivores who have been known to have a bad habit or two. You start to take away their one outlet for relaxation (especially in a war zone, as booze has been taken off the menu) and you're going to run into issues.

And remember this: the military is often the testbed for concepts - be they good or bad - that are later dropped on the populace as a whole. Maybe people shouldn't smoke, but shouldn't that be up to them? You want me to mix the chocolate and peanut butter into a crazy taste explosion for you? Okay, try this on for size: EVERYONE will get government health care, right? WRONG for you smokers, who will be deemed a waste of cash and left to die. Or you'll simply be denied ANY treatment for ANY ailment, be it tobacco related or not, because you DARED break the first rule of Health Club: You do not puff about Health Club. And then the hard liquor goes, then the beer, and the caffeine too. And when the coffee is gone, that's when the feces has impacted the rotary impeller. Eventually we'll be subsisting on nutrient flavor cubes. And you can bet that they'll be introduced first in an MRE...


Yeah... those days are gone...
|

Jul 4, 2009

The unanimous Declaration 



I was listening to talk radio the other day... as I am wont to do... and I heard a some people breathlessly inform the host that they just couldn't bring themselves to celebrate Independence Day, due to the outcome of the last Presidential and the personage that currently embodies the office at 1600 Pennsylvania. They were simply too downtrodden...

I wanted to reach through the radio and choke them.

If your opinion of this great nation, if your love of freedom and justice is so impacted by one person, if all your hopes for the future of this - our Republic - are tied to ONE MAN, then you are worthless and weak... and I have as much time for you as I would for the slimiest, most infantile member of Code Pink.

There are men fighting and dying tonight FOR YOU. And you can't bring yourself to light a sparkler and drink a brew, if for no other reason than in THEIR honor? You disgust me.

If you don't like the way things are going, f'in SACK UP and do something about it. But don't come sobbing to me about how shallow your life is that ONE MAN made you feel so sad you couldn't fight to set your country back to what you believe is the right course. And don't tell me about how you are so down in the dumps that you couldn't take the time to remember - and celebrate - that this is the GREATEST NATION that HAS BEEN or ever WILL BE. Your pity party bores me.
"And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."
|

Jun 30, 2009

The return of the revenge of the Little D 

HE'S TWO!
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
And dear lord he's gettin' big...

Happy Birthday, Little D!
|

Jun 23, 2009

Fair winds and following seas 

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
Semper Fi, Colonel Ed McMahon.
6 Mar 1923 - 23 Jun 2009
|

Jun 22, 2009

Freaking. Classy. 

They want to have the Iranian regime celebrate Independence Day after brutally repressing a freedom movement in Iran? Sickening.
--------------------------
... a gesture of solidarity per our two nations’ shared interest in life, liberty, and shooting women in the heart on the street, I guess.
--------------------------

UPDATE, 24 June: No tofurkey dogs for the Mahdi's boys. How bold!
Yesterday’s left-wing conventional wisdom: We can’t jeopardize diplomacy by taking a meaningless moral stand! Today’s left-wing conventional wisdom: Obama has taken a bold moral stand against regime abuses!
|

Keep on their ass 

The headline is what grabs the attention. "Al Qaeda says would use Pakistani nuclear weapons." We all know it's true - it's not like it's a secret. But in the west, this is what gets play.
"God willing, the nuclear weapons will not fall into the hands of the Americans and the mujahideen would take them and use them against the Americans," Mustafa Abu al-Yazid, the leader of al Qaeda's in Afghanistan, said in an interview with Al Jazeera television.
But what gets overlooked here is far more telling, and is a huge indicator for anyone who pays the least bit of attention.
The militant leader said al Qaeda would be willing to accept a truce of about 10 years' duration with the United States if Washington agreed to withdraw its troops from Muslim countries and stopped backing Israel and the pro-Western governments of Muslim nations.
10 years? Why 10 years? Because that's what The Big Mo did back in the day, when he was in danger of getting his ass kicked.
Hudna (هدنة) is an Arabic term meaning a temporary "truce" or "armistice" as well as "calm" or "quiet", coming from a verbal root meaning "calm". It is sometimes translated as "cease-fire". ...

A particularly famous early hudna was the Treaty of Hudaybiyyah between Muhammad and the Quraysh tribe.

According to Umdat as-Salik, a medieval summary of Shafi'i jurisprudence, hudnas with a non-Muslim enemy should be limited to 10 years: "if Muslims are weak, a truce may be made for ten years if necessary, for the Prophet made a truce with the Quraysh for that long ...
Of course, what is a hudna really, but a time to rearm, recruit, and gain strength. And those 10 years? Don't count on it...
Islam spread widely and quickly during the two years that the treaty was in effect. While Muhammad had 1,400 followers when he signed the treaty in Hudaybiyya, he had well over 10,000 for his conquest of Mecca two years later.
The openness to a "10 year truce" is - literally - the oldest trick in the book when it comes to Islamic warfare. What they count on is that their enemies haven't read the book. This is the time to press the bastards as hard as possible in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Sadly, the forthcoming orders from Gen McChrystal would seem to take a different tack. Not dropping bombs in order to ensure the safety of Afghan civilians will only increase the likelihood of the Taliban literally taking up residence in their homes. Of course, the Taliban was already doing that to a certain extent.

The fact of the matter is that we can only advance in Afghanistan the same way we advanced in Iraq - more troops in the cities interacting with the populace and squeezing the enemy out a few hundred meters at a time. That brings with it a whole host of difficulties all it's own, but if done right, it works. Any way you slice it, it will get worse before it gets better.

--------------------
More here on the history of hudna.
|

Jun 20, 2009

Well no $h!t... 

The fate of three of nine foreigners abducted in Yemen last week is known — their bodies were found, shot execution style. The whereabouts of the other six — including three children under the age of 6 — remain a mystery.

But terrorism experts say their abductors and killers are almost certainly not a mystery. They say the crimes bear the mark of Al Qaeda, and they fear they are the handiwork of the international terror organization's No. 2 man in the Arabian Peninsula: Said Ali al-Shihri, an Islamic extremist who once was in American custody — but who was released from the U.S. detention center in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. ...

No one has claimed responsibility for the abductions and murders, but experts say killing women and children is considered off-limits among many jihadist groups — though not to
al-Shihri, a Saudi national who was released from Guantanamo in November 2007 and sent to a Saudi Arabian "rehabilitation" program for jihadists. It wasn't long before a "cured" al-Shihri was released from the program, crossed into Yemen and rejoined Al Qaeda, with whom he quickly rose to deputy commander.
Who was it just mentioned this? Hmmm... oh, let me think...
|

Jun 15, 2009

Winning the battles, losing the war 

For all the buzz about the recent release of those Uighurs from Gitmo, here's a little tidbit that has been largely overlooked, and is - to my mind - of much greater significance.
During a hearing in Guantanamo in October 2004, Zuhair was accused of involvement in the 1995 killing in Bosnia-Herzegovina of William Jefferson, a U.S. official with the United Nations. At the tribunal, U.S. officials said Jefferson's watch was found on Zuhair.
Regardless of whether they ever did or did not train with Al Qaeda, the Uighurs never personally attacked us. In fact, their main beef is with the Red Commie Chinese, which tells me that we at least have grounds for an understanding of some sort. But Ahmed Zuhair - murderer, car bomber convicted in absentia by the Bosnians, and self-professed participant in the attack on the USS Cole that killed 17 American sailors - is unquestionably an enemy of America. And he is now sitting in Saudi Arabia, taking part in their "terrorist rehabilitation program"... which of course means that you'll see him again soon, coming to a theater (of operations) near you.

Like Pakistan, the Saudi's don't give a flying f@#k about terrorism, provided it doesn't happen inside their borders and isn't a threat to their rule. They'll be more than happy to house and feed the guy for a while. And then, when they think enough time has gone by, he'll up and disappear. And the Saudis will be shocked, shocked, by his "escape".

This is what happens when terrorists are handled in the same manner as shoplifters. Guantanamo IS NOT the 37th Precinct holding tank and the animals contained therein should not be treated like common con-men and thieves who can lawyer up, be let out on bail, or get off on technicalities. But what the hell do I know? Maybe the FBI will be able to clear all this up with the solid application of Miranda warnings to Al Qaeda members that we catch in the act of detonating IEDs.

We can win every battle in the field, but if this is how we're going to treat the enemy - rub down, shiatsu, and all expenses paid travel to either the island paradise or terrorist supporting nation of their choice - then we will most certainly lose the war.
|

Jun 6, 2009

Always Faithful 



To those boys of Point du Hoc, and all the others that were there on that Day of Days, I offer the best tribute I can as a Marine... two simple words: Semper Fi.
|

May 30, 2009

Nothing to see here... move along... 

The rest of the world doesn’t observe Memorial Day. But it understands the crude symbolism of a rogue nuclear test staged on the day to honor American war dead and greeted with only half-hearted pro forma diplomatese from Washington. Pyongyang’s actions were “a matter of...” Drumroll, please! “... grave concern,” declared the president. Furthermore, if North Korea carries on like this, it will — wait for it — “not find international acceptance.” As the comedian Andy Borowitz put it, “President Obama said that the United States was prepared to respond to the threat with ‘the strongest possible adjectives...
|

May 21, 2009

The beard that knows no fear 

Who's the one man awesomely awesome enough to stop crime dead in it's tracks, even when lacking all three of the dimensions that the criminals have access to?

I think you know who...
|

May 18, 2009

The picture that explains everything 

To steal a line from Patton, I didn't make this... but I wish to hell I had.

Click image to biggie-size
Image Hosted by ImageShack.us
|

Apr 18, 2009

GET. SOME. 

"Sergeant Reese gave his rifle to another sniper to cover him while he tried to cut away a Taliban fighter’s ammunition pouches with a four-inch blade. The fighter had only been pretending to be dead, the soldiers said. He lunged for Sergeant Reese, who stabbed him in the left eye."
|

Apr 17, 2009

... bu... how... wha? 

Every picture is worth a thousand words, yet this leaves me speechless.

Image Hosted by ImageShack.us

Hugo Chavez: just another guy that POTUS pals around with.
|

Apr 14, 2009

Oh by the way... 

I may be an enemy of the state... as may be you, just by your very reading of this blog.
|

Ex-Marine gets yet another bye 

After being honored with an award from the Secretary of the Navy, Rep. John Murtha - Corrupt, Lying Porkocrat (Pa.) - has now managed to skate for defaming Marines accused (but never convicted, or for the most part even brought to trial) of the "massacre" in Haditha. His defense? "I'm above your laws, petty mortals."

Murtha, a former Marine, used his congressional immunity as his defense, arguing that he made those statements to the press in his official capacity as a member of Congress. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on Tuesday ruled that Wuterich can't sue Murtha.
Semper I, huh motherf@cker? Way to sea-lawyer the $hit out of the actual law, you tool. So here's to John Murtha and the DC Circuit Court of Appeals - co-winners of Douche of the Week.
|

Apr 11, 2009

Guerra contra latrunculi... or, How I learned to Stop Worrying and go Roman 

"...the various new substitutes for "unlawful enemy combatant" abolish an important distinction in traditional international law. As the eminent military historian Sir Michael Howard argued shortly after 9/11, the status of al Qaeda terrorists is to be found in a distinction first made by the Romans and subsequently incorporated into international law by way of medieval and early modern European jurisprudence. According to Mr. Howard, the Romans distinguished between bellum (war against legitimus hostis, a legitimate enemy) and guerra (war against latrunculi, pirates, robbers, brigands and outlaws).

Bellum became the standard for interstate conflict, and it is here that the Geneva Conventions were meant to apply. They do not apply to guerra. Indeed, punishment for latrunculi, "the common enemies of mankind," traditionally has been summary execution.

Though they don't often employ the term, many legal experts agree that al Qaeda fighters are latrunculi -- hardly distinguishable by their actions from
pirates and the like."

--------------
UPDATE:

Obviously, if the United States Navy hanged some eyepatched peglegged blackguard from the yardarm or made him walk the plank, pious senators would rise to denounce an America that no longer lived up to its highest ideals, and the network talking-heads would argue that Plankgate was recruiting more and more young men to the pirates’ cause, and judges would rule that pirates were entitled to the protections of the U.S. constitution and that their peglegs had to be replaced by high-tech prosthetic limbs at taxpayer expense.


UPDATE II: Latrunculi assume room sea temperature courtesy of... well DoD ain't sayin', but I'd put dollars to donuts that a SEAL Team just got some trigger time.
|

Apr 8, 2009

Dedicated to the crew of the Maersk Alabama 

I know it didn't happen this way, but in my mind it went down something like this...



In all seriousness though, I do hope the Navy can get the captain back safe and sound.
|

Apr 7, 2009

Fair and balanced 

In light of the link I put up two days ago regarding the comparative appearances before a group of troops by both the current POTUS and the former one, I now provide you with the vid of Mr Obama's visit to Baghdad today. Is this event more comparable to the one when W. visited Anbar? Sure it is. Does Obama get some love in Baghdad? Sure he does. Is it to the same level of fervor? I'll leave that to you to decide.

Regardless of what the troops thought of him, no one seemed to think more highly of his impact in Iraq than the man himself, though.
"It's important for us to use all of our influence to encourage the parties to resolve these issues in ways that are equitable. I think that my presence here can help do that."
Sure, why not? Sunni and Shi'ite have only been at each other's throats for the last thousand years or so in that region. America - through many different organizations, but mostly the military - has been trying to bring order to chaos for the last 6-plus years. But one afternoon in country and that $h!t's wired tight, just by his mere presence.

And to prove once again that the press neither knows nor cares about anything related to the military, ABC happily reports that "The president was expected to hand out 10 Medals of Valor" while he was there. Exqueeze me? Just WTF is a 'Medal of Valor'? No such animal exists in the US military. Was he giving away the Israeli Medal of Valor? Because that would probably piss off the Iraqis. Of course, they probably mean "medals FOR valor" which could be any of a plethora, especially when you start adding on that "Combat V".

All that being said, I leave you with the inside scoop on POTUS' Baghdad trip, as provided by TOTUS.
|

Apr 6, 2009

"...and we will write you a letter telling you how angry we are." 

Death, taxes, the UN's complete lack of relevance. Some things never change.

By the way, no clicky the below with the kiddies present... but of course, I'm sure you already knew that.



Meanwhile, the Jonger is grooving to his new satellite radio service.

*Apparently, Hans Blix actually was consumed by sharks, because he ceased being relevant (assuming he ever was) shortly after Team America's release. Even his Wikipedia page gives up on him after 2006.
|

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?

Weblog Commenting by HaloScan.com